New Liberal Ad: Most Negative in Canadian history?
The new Liberal ad compares Stephen Harper with Third World tin-pot dictators, all because he Prorogued Parliament to reset the Parliamentary agenda. It is perhaps the most negative of any political attack ad in Canadian history.
Compare several well known examples... which one's the worst?
The Liberals 2010 "Harper is a Dictator" ad:
The Tories 2008 "Dion is Not a Leader" series:
The Liberals 2006 "Soldiers with Guns" ad:
The Tories "Chretien Face Ad" (CBC report with clips from ad included):
Discuss... you decide, which one takes the cake for "Most Negative Canadian Political Ad"? And while we're on the topic, have you noticed that just about every Liberal ad I can recall tries to make Canadians "afraid" of Stephen Harper?
Well, almost every Liberal ad, looks like Michael finally found his way out of Narnia... but it looks like it took him through the depths of darkness in the White Witches castle first.
Compare several well known examples... which one's the worst?
The Liberals 2010 "Harper is a Dictator" ad:
The Tories 2008 "Dion is Not a Leader" series:
The Liberals 2006 "Soldiers with Guns" ad:
The Tories "Chretien Face Ad" (CBC report with clips from ad included):
Discuss... you decide, which one takes the cake for "Most Negative Canadian Political Ad"? And while we're on the topic, have you noticed that just about every Liberal ad I can recall tries to make Canadians "afraid" of Stephen Harper?
Well, almost every Liberal ad, looks like Michael finally found his way out of Narnia... but it looks like it took him through the depths of darkness in the White Witches castle first.
posted by Christian Conservative @ 5:03 p.m.
5 Comments:
At Sun Jan 10, 06:33:00 p.m. EST,
Anonymous said…
This has W Katmeat all over it but. I am not surprised. Crap like this is the best the desperate lieberals can come up with. I wonder why it isn't on TV? I guess financially strapped clowns know the lame stream media will pick up the YouTube clip and televise it for free.
Rob C
At Sun Jan 10, 07:21:00 p.m. EST,
Anonymous said…
I guess financially strapped clowns
Convincing argument. The party with the most cash wins.
At Sun Jan 10, 11:51:00 p.m. EST,
Anonymous said…
TangoJuliette sez:
Yo! Nonny loon. You mean that now, the party with the greatest base group of supporters and contributors, as opposed to the old days when the party with the greatest sway over the MotherCorps & MSM media Pravda-ites, would invariably win, screw the pooch, the country and the treasury.
Glad to see that *that's* not going to continue as the success template for quite some long time into the future.
Probably even less chance of that gang of librano sponsoship wheeler'n'dealers happening to win again, once the BUCK/95 subsidy gets revoked.
ttfn
t
t.e.&o.e.
At Tue Jan 12, 10:00:00 a.m. EST,
Anonymous said…
As if you're criticizing the Liberals for running an attack ad.
You're all such hypocrites, not surprising since the biggest ones I know are all bible-thumps like you.
At Sat Feb 06, 02:57:00 p.m. EST,
Canadu said…
It took Iggy a week and a Facebook group to come out against the suspension of Parliament. The attack ads are futile. The only thing Iggy's got going for him is that he's got great eyebrows. Some women would kill to have eyebrows like that. So the only card that the Libs should play is: 'Vote for us because our leader would be the best looking P.M. since John Turner slicked back his hair and wore that Armani suit.'
Post a Comment
<< Home